Prior to a fairly recent change, when making a hotel reservation at Marriott.com, users were able to make a selection to show or not show a map locating the hotels on the list of available properties for the search request. If the user opted to see the map, it remained "frozen" at the top of the screen (i.e. map always visible at the top) while scrolling through the list of hotels which followed it.
Marriott.com has apparently been "enhanced" to force the user to EITHER view the map OR view the hotel list. Unfortunately, it is not possible to see both at the same time - one has to continually toggle back and forth between the map to review locations and the list to compare prices.
I find this 1) very user UN-friendly 2) a huge time-waster for people trying to easily find the right hotel in the right location at the right price and 3) completely devoid of any logic.
To Marriott, I would ask: Did you have complaints about the old hotel list/map display? Did you check with a focus group? Did they actually agree that this solution is better?
To me, this is a great example of "If it ain't broke, DON'T FIX IT!" While the old display wasn't perfect, it was far better than what Marriott has decided we need and is delivering now. Am I all wet, or has anyone else noticed (and been frustrated by this too?)
I usually like to do my own reservations and the Marriott.com site, while rather clunky compared to Hilton's, allowed me to do my own bookings with a minimum of fuss and frustration. This so-called "enhancement" may entice me to go back to calling Marriott Reservations and let THEM do all the work for me - at greater cost to Marriott.
all best regards to my fellow Insiders
Wow, that IS interesting!
As a kid, when I was an annoying little brother, my big sister always picked on me by telling me I had been adopted. - perhaps Pluto77 is my long lost "birth sibling"?
No, I hadn't seen pluto77's post and even did a search for "Map", "Marriott.com" and other terms so I could add my comments to an existing thread rather than starting a new one. Alas, none of those searches returned that topic so I started what I thought was a new topic!
Thanks for letting me know another thread exists!